I admit, I struggle with the use of "Understand" as part of any Learning Objective.... hopefully the AI will improve so that "understand" is no longer applied.
Fascinating stuff. To me though, it seems that the objectives would have been faster to write on your own, seeing you already had the understanding of how to do it. That way too, they would be significantly more contextualised to your course?
I understood the purpose of the post to be more of a showcase of how the tool could be exploited to create a *springboard* efficiently (not a final product), which could then be refined in a more context-sensitive and personal way. What a great start this would be for someone tasked with designing a course - particularly someone without an education background! The last point captures this well, I think - the learning designer's job in this case is to act as the expert link between raw content and context.
I admit, I struggle with the use of "Understand" as part of any Learning Objective.... hopefully the AI will improve so that "understand" is no longer applied.
Fascinating stuff. To me though, it seems that the objectives would have been faster to write on your own, seeing you already had the understanding of how to do it. That way too, they would be significantly more contextualised to your course?
I understood the purpose of the post to be more of a showcase of how the tool could be exploited to create a *springboard* efficiently (not a final product), which could then be refined in a more context-sensitive and personal way. What a great start this would be for someone tasked with designing a course - particularly someone without an education background! The last point captures this well, I think - the learning designer's job in this case is to act as the expert link between raw content and context.
In theory, AI learns from this first exercise, right? The next time it writes LOs, they would look more like that end product, I'm guessing.